Actvity 3.5 Group Activity: Theories into Practice: TED Talk Analysis
Activity 3.5 - Group Activity: Theories into Practice: TED Talk Analysis
I, Jean Piaget, saw an impressive
demonstration (Video:1) of pupils in a classroom, strangely sitting on the floor
or on couches. The pupils found partners
and used their unique knowledge structures to cognitively classify and compare equations,
and construct models of the decimal 2.4. The pupils worked to assimilate and
accommodate a new partner’s knowledge
structures into theirs. The pupils proved to the class how they adapted, organized
and modeled their accumulated knowledge. There was much cognitive conflict and
dissonance expressed during this lesson. Because this was a fourth/fifth combination
class, different stages of cognitive development, were apparent. One poor lad,
Malachi, was unable to assimilate this new information. The teacher facilitated
discussion rather than transmit exact answers. He respected the process of moving
from disequilibrium to equilibrium as each pupil accumulated new knowledge, and
achieved cognitive balance. The teaching methods were sound, while his pupils
were interested, active learners.
3 Comments:
Ah, it seems we have come to agree once again, my friend. This instructor has used superb knowledge of both our theories to establish a learning environment that is fostering the most student learning possible. In one lesson, he takes the pupils from their level of actual devel0pment to reaching their potential development.
L.Vygotsky
HI, Jean Piaget:
You have done a great job! I do agree with that the teacher acts as facilitator in this class. He encourage students to seek equilibrium through assimilate and accommodate by themselves.
Interesting ideas Mr. Piaget. I did not know there was such advancements in the field of mind reading. How can you claim that all of these processes are occurring without seeing them or observing them? As I explained to your pal, Mr. Vygotsky, we must root our practice of learning in observable, objective, measurable terms. The stimulus of being presented with a task, develop equations that equal 2.4, can only be linked to the direct behavior of either completing the equations successfully or unsuccessfully. Furthermore, the likelihood of the student continuing to use or employ the behavior of writing an equation is contingent upon the reinforcement of getting it right, or the punishment of getting it wrong. Thank you for such thought provoking input, but I think it is operating outside the bounds of our tangible reality.
All the best,
B.F. Skinner
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home