Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Actvity 3.5 Group Activity: Theories into Practice: TED Talk Analysis


Activity 3.5 - Group Activity: Theories into Practice: TED Talk Analysis

I, Jean Piaget, saw an impressive demonstration (Video:1) of pupils in a classroom, strangely sitting on the floor or on couches.  The pupils found partners and used their unique knowledge structures to cognitively classify and compare equations, and construct models of the decimal 2.4. The pupils worked to assimilate and accommodate a new partner’s knowledge structures into theirs. The pupils proved to the class how they adapted, organized and modeled their accumulated knowledge. There was much cognitive conflict and dissonance expressed during this lesson.  Because this was a fourth/fifth combination class, different stages of cognitive development, were apparent. One poor lad, Malachi, was unable to assimilate this new information. The teacher facilitated discussion rather than transmit exact answers. He respected the process of moving from disequilibrium to equilibrium as each pupil accumulated new knowledge, and achieved cognitive balance. The teaching methods were sound, while his pupils were interested, active learners.

3 Comments:

At September 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM , Blogger Leah said...

Ah, it seems we have come to agree once again, my friend. This instructor has used superb knowledge of both our theories to establish a learning environment that is fostering the most student learning possible. In one lesson, he takes the pupils from their level of actual devel0pment to reaching their potential development.
L.Vygotsky

 
At September 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

HI, Jean Piaget:
You have done a great job! I do agree with that the teacher acts as facilitator in this class. He encourage students to seek equilibrium through assimilate and accommodate by themselves.

 
At September 19, 2013 at 3:35 PM , Blogger nf20ae said...

Interesting ideas Mr. Piaget. I did not know there was such advancements in the field of mind reading. How can you claim that all of these processes are occurring without seeing them or observing them? As I explained to your pal, Mr. Vygotsky, we must root our practice of learning in observable, objective, measurable terms. The stimulus of being presented with a task, develop equations that equal 2.4, can only be linked to the direct behavior of either completing the equations successfully or unsuccessfully. Furthermore, the likelihood of the student continuing to use or employ the behavior of writing an equation is contingent upon the reinforcement of getting it right, or the punishment of getting it wrong. Thank you for such thought provoking input, but I think it is operating outside the bounds of our tangible reality.

All the best,
B.F. Skinner

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home